Hair restoration has advanced far beyond the outdated “strip method.” Today, patients can choose between two leading follicular unit extraction (FUE) techniques: NeoGraft® and ARTAS® Robotic Hair Restoration. Both are minimally invasive, avoiding scalpels, stitches, and linear scars. However, ARTAS introduces a level of robotic precision and AI-driven customization that is redefining the future of hair transplantation. At Bloom Facial Plastic Surgery, Dr. Jason Bloom, an Ivy League–trained, double board-certified facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon, offers both options to deliver the most effective and individualized treatment. Here’s how NeoGraft and ARTAS compare, and why robotics are raising the standard in hair restoration.
What Is NeoGraft?
NeoGraft automates the follicular unit extraction (FUE) technique, making hair transplantation less invasive than traditional strip surgery. Rather than removing a section of scalp, the system extracts follicles one by one from the donor area and transplants them into thinning or balding regions. Key advantages of NeoGraft include:
- Minimally invasive approach with no scalpels.
- No stitches, staples, or linear scarring
- Mild recovery with little to no discomfort.
- Patients typically return to normal activities within 24 hours
- Results that look natural and allow versatile styling
For many, NeoGraft provides a proven solution that achieves healthy, natural growth with minimal downtime.
How ARTAS Redefines Hair Restoration
NeoGraft modernized FUE, but ARTAS elevates it further with robotic precision and artificial intelligence. Using high-definition stereoscopic vision and advanced algorithms, ARTAS identifies the strongest follicles for harvesting and implants them with consistent accuracy. Benefits of ARTAS include:
- Long-lasting, natural hair growth that improves steadily over time
- Personalized hairline design with 3D planning based on facial features
- Greater efficiency and speed due to optimized graft selection
- Preservation of donor area appearance with intelligent harvesting
- A minimally invasive process that leaves no linear scarring
By reducing the variability of manual techniques, ARTAS ensures results that seamlessly blend with existing hair.
Comparing ARTAS and NeoGraft
Both ARTAS and NeoGraft provide minimally invasive solutions for hair loss, but the difference lies in precision, consistency, and personalization:
- Technology: NeoGraft relies on manual operation, while ARTAS uses robotic guidance and AI for follicle selection and placement.
- Accuracy: ARTAS minimizes the chance of damaged follicles and ensures consistent, natural alignment during implantation.
- Customization: ARTAS creates 3D visualizations of your future hairline, offering a tailored approach that NeoGraft cannot replicate to the same degree.
- Downtime: Both allow a relatively quick recovery, but ARTAS often results in less post-procedure discomfort and greater efficiency overall.
Ultimately, ARTAS gives patients the advantage of advanced robotics working alongside the expertise of Dr. Bloom, delivering results that feel as natural as they look.
Restore Your Confidence with Robotic Precision
Selecting the right technique is just as important as selecting the right surgeon. NeoGraft remains an effective and trusted option, but ARTAS Robotic Hair Restoration sets a new benchmark in accuracy and personalization. At Bloom Facial Plastic Surgery, Dr. Bloom combines his elite training and focused expertise with cutting-edge technology to help patients restore not only their hairline, but also their confidence. Contact our office today to schedule your consultation and take the first step toward fuller, healthier-looking hair.